Religious freedom in the Atlantic
World was relative to three important factors, religion and ethnicity. Muslims and Jews experienced much less
freedom to worship then the Christian powers that largely controlled the
region. Africans and Native Americans
often had their native religious beliefs silenced by the European slave owners
and invaders, often in the name of conversion.
And African Christians in Africa were allotted much more liberty in how
they worshiped then African Christians enslaved in the New World. The following
is an examination of the religious freedom of Jews, Christians, and Muslims in
the Atlantic World as evidenced by the writings assigned for this course.
For
many of the Africans slaves forced across the Atlantic, Islam was their
religion of familiarity. But for these
Africans, their religious beliefs were rarely if ever tolerated. Though they would find ways to practice
privately, many “African slaves who had been brought in chains from West Africa
had been forced to observe the practices of their masters’ religion under
rigidly specified conditions” (Afroz, 229).
Forced baptism was a normal occurrence, as the Christian slave owners
were often required to convert their subjects to the faith of their ruling
monarchy. For Muslim slaves, though, it
was not all that difficult to keep with their native beliefs, as Christianity
and Islam follow much of the same doctrine, allowing Africans slaves to play
the line between the two. Regardless of
the similarity, to “Muslim slaves… Christianity, represented oppression”
(Afroz, 233).
Jews
in the Atlantic World experienced much more freedom then the Muslim Africans of
the region, but that does not mean that their religious beliefs were
respected. Jews were largely looked down
upon in the Old World, and what flexibility they experienced in the New World was
often due to their value to the corporate powers of the region. In the Atlantic, Jews were able to pave a new
path for themselves, with Jewish intervention being especially “instrumental in
the extension of the privileges that were granted in the Dutch colonies… The
Jews conspicuous significance in trans-Atlantic commerce earned them the right
to retail trade in Brazil, which was not recognized in Amsterdam” (Klooster,
136). By proving themselves invaluable,
Jews across the Atlantic were able to establish themselves in the New World,
and were thus allotted personal and religious freedoms not common in the Old
World.
There
seems to have been two forms of Christianity in the Atlantic World. On the Old World side, specifically Africa,
Christian missionaries were often much more open minded, even willing to make
certain concessions that would blend some of the African cultural norms with
Christian practices. In this respect,
they were able to justify their actions as conversion. However, for those who were to be shipped
across the Atlantic to the New World, conversion was forced. “Ever since the early days of the Atlantic
slave trade, Papal Bulls and royal orders required that slaves be given
religious instruction, and baptized as quickly as possible after purchase”
(Thornton, 269). Much of the infusion of
African practices into Christian norms in Africa, were not tolerated in the New
World. “Christian clergy did suppress a
considerable amount of African practice, some of it apparently religious, in
the Americas” (Thornton, 276).
Religious
freedom was relative to ethnicity, religion, and location. African slaves with Islamic beliefs
experienced little religious freedom, and were usually forced to
conversion. African Christians in Africa
were converted much more peacefully then their enslaved New World counterparts,
and were allotted much more religious freedom in customizing their methods of
practice. Jews, meanwhile, experienced
very different levels of religious freedom dependent location. Though not necessarily forced to convert,
Jews in the Old World were not allotted the social freedoms of other religious
groups. But in the New World, Jews
established themselves as integral members of society, especially in the port
cities of the Atlantic World. In
summary, religious freedom in the Atlantic World was relative to the
circumstances of ethnicity, religion, and location.
Nice post. I agree with you that the Jews were able to attain more religious freedom because they were valuable to the economy of the Atlantic. As you will recall from the Klooster article, the Dutch invaded Brazil and overall allowed religious freedom to the Jews there because they were "indispensable to the colony" (Klooster, 137). In regards to other Jews, Muslims, and African slaves - being able to exert a convincing Christian appearance was the main goal. Surely, some wholeheartedly had converted to Christianity, but many practiced their respective religion secretly while professing to be a Christian. For example, African Christianity was allowed in the New World, but acts of "fetishisms" such as nocturnal dancing were deemed unacceptable and thus punished. I thought the Atlantic World was more tolerant as long as you practiced some form of Christianity such as African Christianity. In Europe, the power of state churches was much more powerful than in the New World - and thus much more strict in comparison.
ReplyDeleteWould individuals of other religions enjoyed much more freedom if their masters had a stronger religious standpoint? Throughout the course we have equated tolerance with religion, meaning that those who "religion" are more tolerant of others? But could there be a slave master who had religion in their life? Jews are considered now a variant of Chrisitianity? Would Jews have been targeted by slave owners and forced to convert?
ReplyDelete